January 2, 1863:
Battle
of Stones River
(Murfreesboro)
Tennessee
Day 3: Rosecrans the day before (Jan. 2) has sent
Gen. Beatty’s division (from Crittenden’s Corps) across Stones River to
entrench on a small eminence of high ground there, supported by artillery. Bragg, meanwhile, had been receiving reports from Gen.
Wheeler, who has been raiding in the Union rear. Wheeler’s squadrons are harassing wagon
trains full of Union wounded streaming back along the turnpike to Nashville,
and this information convinces Bragg that the Yankees are preparing to
retreat---so he waits, hoping for this. By
mid-afternoon, it is clear that Rosecrans is not yet leaving, and so Bragg
develops a plan that he hopes will prod the Yankees into thinking their
position untenable, and thus to retreat.
Maj. General John C. Breckinridge, CSA |
He orders Maj. Gen. John C. Breckinridge (former Vice President of the United States), holding the far right of the Rebel line, to attack
the Union forces on the same side of the river.
Breckinridge at first protests, believing that the long advance over
open ground will decimate his division.
Bragg insists, and so Breckinridge deploys his men and steps off at
about 4:00 PM.
Breckinridge attacks |
His 5 brigades (Adams,
Palmer, Preston, Hanson, and Jackson) sweep over the field and up the
heights. After only a few minutes of intense
fighting, Beatty’s Federals give way and retreat back over McFadden’s ford, the
Southern attack apparently having caught them by surprise. The Rebels pursue, but meet 45 cannon lined
up hub-to-hub on the heights across the river, commanded by Capt. Mendenhall,
Crittenden’s artillery chief. Another 7
cannon are placed to enfilade the Rebel columns. The Union artillery fire shreds
Breckinridge’s formations, and in less than an hour, Breckinridge’s division
has suffered more than 1,800 casualties.
The Orphan Brigade (Hanson’s Kentuckians) has lost a third of its
number. At about 4:45 PM, Gen. Negley’s
Federals counterattack across the river, and drive Breckinridge’s division
back.
Negley's Counterattack |
For all intents and purposes, the
Battle of Stones River is over. Out of
20 brigades, 17 of them are shattered and unable to deploy for battle. The next day, a huge supply train comes in to
the Federal army from Nashville, and Wheeler’s cavalry is unable to intercept
it. Bragg also knows that reinforcements---fresh troops---would soon arrive for
Rosecrans. There is a little skirmishing
along the lines on January 3, but Bragg’s army is nearly out of supplies, and
he decides to retreat that evening.
Although statistically a draw, according to some historians,
the facts that Rosecrans advanced to challenge Bragg’s forward position at
Murfressboro, and that Bragg, after three days, wasted his army and was unable
to drive the Yankees from the field, all make a good case that this was a
crucial Union victory, both strategically and morale-wise. This
battle was the bloodiest battle in the Civil War, for the percentage of
casualties of those engaged. Union
Victory.
U.S. Army of the
Cumberland Maj. Gen. William S.
Rosecrans 41,400 men
C.S. Army of Tennessee Gen.
Braxton Bragg 35,000
men
Losses: Killed Wounded Captured/Missing Total
Union 1,677 7,543 3,686 12,906
Confederate
1,294 7,945
2,500
11,739
---An
editorial in the New York Times offers a very hopeful spin on the events of
1862,
In our review,
yesterday, of our military successes during the year that has closed, it was
made very apparent that the rebellion could not survive another twelvemonth of
similar experience. It was shown that the reduction of a like amount of
territory to the old flag in 1863, as in 1862, would literally wipe the
Confederacy from the face of the earth. Considering the present magnitude and
splendid condition of our army, and the superb fleet of gunboats just completed
— which will not only be able to gain possession of the three remaining
Southern ports, but to ascend the Southern rivers far into the interior — it is
certainly not unreasonable to believe that the restoration of the National
authority can proceed, to say the least, as rapidly hereafter as it has
heretofore. . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment