July 31, 1863
---The New York Times publishes an
editorial arguing that the state of Tennessee, now almost entirely in Union
hands, ought to be ready to be re-admitted to the Union:
The public attention has not, for
some time, been called to the civil condition of the State of Tennessee, which,
since BRAGG’S retreat, is peculiar and anomalous. There is now no large army,
either rebel or Union, planted on its soil. The army of Gen. ROSECRANS, though
nominally still in the State, is pressing upon and felt by Alabama and Georgia
more than by Tennessee. While the State is therefore delivered from the
presence of military rule, it has no civil government anywhere erected or
respected. There are no courts, no laws, no civil administration, no body
politic, no taxation nor representation. The population of the State, reduced
by the war to perhaps 800,000. is in utter social and political chaos.
The time is propitious for
reorganization, and the work has fairly commenced. A State Convention met at
Nashville on the 1st inst., and continued in session till the 7th. Between
forty and fifty counties were represented, (about half of the State,) by about
two hundred members. The Convention recommended the election of a Legislature
in August, to form a civil Government, reestablish Courts and laws, and restore
the State to the Union. This programme will be carried out. The expulsion of
the last strong body of rebels from the State has made it practicable, and the people
are already absorbed in the consideration and discussion of the issues
presented in this new phase of affairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment